Abstract
AbstractConstraint-based models (CBMs) are used to study metabolic network structure and function in organisms ranging from microbes to multicellular eukaryotes. Published CBMs are usually generic rather than context-specific, meaning that they do not capture differences in reaction activities, which, in turn, determine metabolic capabilities, between cell types, tissues, environments, or other conditions. Only a subset of a CBM’s metabolic reactions and capabilities are likely to be active in any given context, and several methods have therefore been developed to extract context-specific models from generic CBMs through integration of omics data. We tested the ability of six model extraction methods (MEMs) to create functionally accurate context-specific models of Atlantic salmon using a generic CBM (SALARECON) and liver transcriptomics data from contexts differing in water salinity (life stage) and dietary lipids. Three MEMs (iMAT, INIT, and GIMME) outperformed the others in terms of functional accuracy, which we defined as the extracted models’ ability to perform context-specific metabolic tasks inferred directly from the data, and one MEM (GIMME) was faster than the others. Context-specific versions of SALARECON consistently outperformed the generic version, showing that context-specific modeling better captures salmon metabolism. Thus, we demonstrate that results from human studies also hold for a non-mammalian animal and major livestock species.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Drug Discovery,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Modeling and Simulation
Reference58 articles.
1. Nielsen, J. Systems biology of metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 245–275 (2017).
2. Heirendt, L. et al. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0. Nat. Protoc. 14, 639–702 (2019).
3. Fang, X., Lloyd, C. J. & Palsson, B. O. Reconstructing organisms in silico: genome-scale models and their emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1–13 http://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00440-4 (2020).
4. Norsigian, C. J. et al. BiGG models 2020: multi-strain genome-scale models and expansion across the phylogenetic tree. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D402–D406 (2020).
5. Moretti, S., Tran, V. D. T., Mehl, F., Ibberson, M. & Pagni, M. MetaNetX/MNXref: unified namespace for metabolites and biochemical reactions in the context of metabolic models. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D570–D574 (2021).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献