Abstract
AbstractPasture-based and grass-fed branding are often associated with consumer perceptions of improved human health, environmental performance and animal welfare. Here, to examine the impacts of dairy production in detail, we contrasted global observational (n = 156) data for nitrogen and phosphorus losses from land by the duration of outdoor livestock grazing in confined, grazed and hybrid systems. Observational nitrogen losses for confined systems were lowest on a productivity—but not area—basis. No differences were noted for phosphorus losses between the systems. Modelling of the three dairy systems in New Zealand, the United States and the Netherlands yielded similar results. We found insufficient evidence that grazed dairy systems have lower nutrient losses than confined ones, but trade-offs exist between systems at farm scale. The use of a hybrid system may allow for uniform distribution of stored excreta, controlled dietary intake, high productivity and mitigation of animal welfare issues arising from climatic extremes.
Funder
Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference78 articles.
1. Alonso, M. E., González-Montaña, J. R. & Lomillos, J. M. Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals 10, 385 (2020).
2. Bai, Z. et al. China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8534 (2018).
3. OECD & FAO OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020–2029 (OECD, 2020); https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/1112c23b-en
4. Alexander, P. et al. Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system. Agric. Syst. 153, 190–200 (2017).
5. Scarsbrook, M. R. & Melland, A. R. Dairying and water-quality issues in Australia and New Zealand. Anim. Prod. Sci. 55, 856–868 (2015).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献