Evaluation of Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity by Various Vasodilating Stimuli: Comparison of CO2 to Acetazolamide

Author:

Ringelstein Erich Bernd1,Van Eyck Sabine1,Mertens Irene1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Klinikum RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Abstract

To evaluate the role of different vasomotor stimuli for the measurement of cerebrovascular vasomotor reactivity (VMR), 47 patients (i.e., 93 hemispheres) with various degrees of internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusive disease were studied. Patients were divided into clinical [asymptomatic, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or completed stroke] as well as angiological subgroups. Low-grade or high-grade unilateral ICA lesions were compared to bilateral ICA occlusive disease. Relative flow velocity changes within the middle cerebral artery were measured by means of transcranial Doppler during hyper- and hypocapnia (VMRTOT), during hypercapnia alone, and after injection of 1 g acetazolamide (VMRACE). VMR was expressed as the percentage change in flow velocity after stimulus application as compared with flow velocity at rest. There was a close and statistically highly significant correlation of CO2-induced with acetazolamide-induced VMR ( r = 0.69 in VMRTOT versus VMRACE and 0.79 in versus VMRACE; p < 0.0001; linear regression), indicating a strong similarity of the vasodilatative effects of CO2 and acetazolamide on cerebral arteries. Both stimulation techniques highly significantly differentiated between asymptomatic patients and those with TIA or completed stroke. Angiological subgroups were separated best by the acetazolamide test. Reclassification of patients into angiological subgroups by linear discriminant analysis was equally good with all three methods. We conclude that both acetazolamide- and CO2-induced stimulation of the cerebral vasomotors are valid techniques to measure reduction in perfusion reserve due to extracranial cerebrovascular occlusive disease. Acetazolamide has the advantage of being independent of the patient's cooperation. However, it has the disadvantage of increasing the intracranial pressure and not permitting evaluation of the vasoconstrictor capabilities of the cerebral vasculature.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3