Using the virtual reality device Oculus Rift for neuropsychological assessment of visual processing capabilities

Author:

Foerster Rebecca M.,Poth Christian H.,Behler Christian,Botsch Mario,Schneider Werner X.

Abstract

Abstract Neuropsychological assessment of human visual processing capabilities strongly depends on visual testing conditions including room lighting, stimuli, and viewing-distance. This limits standardization, threatens reliability, and prevents the assessment of core visual functions such as visual processing speed. Increasingly available virtual reality devices allow to address these problems. One such device is the portable, light-weight, and easy-to-use Oculus Rift. It is head-mounted and covers the entire visual field, thereby shielding and standardizing the visual stimulation. A fundamental prerequisite to use Oculus Rift for neuropsychological assessment is sufficient test-retest reliability. Here, we compare the test-retest reliabilities of Bundesen’s visual processing components (visual processing speed, threshold of conscious perception, capacity of visual working memory) as measured with Oculus Rift and a standard CRT computer screen. Our results show that Oculus Rift allows to measure the processing components as reliably as the standard CRT. This means that Oculus Rift is applicable for standardized and reliable assessment and diagnosis of elementary cognitive functions in laboratory and clinical settings. Oculus Rift thus provides the opportunity to compare visual processing components between individuals and institutions and to establish statistical norm distributions.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference46 articles.

1. Neumann, O. In Perspective on Perception and Action (eds. Heuer, H. & Sanders, A. F. ) 469 (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987).

2. Prinz, W. In Eye movements and psychological functions: International views (eds. Groner, R., Menz, C., Fisher, D. F. & Monty, R. A. ) 85–100 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983).

3. Land, M. F. & Tatler, B. W. Looking and acting. (Oxford University Press, 2009).

4. Foerster, R. M. & Schneider, W. X. Expectation violations in sensorimotor sequences: Shifting from LTM-based attentional selection to visual search. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1339, 45–59 (2015).

5. Bundesen, C. A theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 97, 523–547 (1990).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3