Abstract
AbstractIncreasing workplace diversity is a common goal. Given research showing that minority applicants anticipate better treatment in diverse workplaces, we ran a field experiment (N = 1,585 applicants, N = 31,928 website visitors) exploring how subtle organizational diversity cues affected applicant behaviour. Potential applicants viewed a company with varying levels of racial/ethnic or gender diversity. There was little evidence that racial/ethnic or gender diversity impacted the demographic composition or quality of the applicant pool. However, fewer applications were submitted to organizations with one form of diversity (that is, racial/ethnic or gender diversity), and more applications were submitted to organizations with only white men employees or employees diverse in race/ethnicity and gender. Finally, exploratory analyses found that female applicants were rated as more qualified than male applicants. Presenting a more diverse workforce does not guarantee more minority applicants, and organizations seeking to recruit minority applicants may need stronger displays of commitments to diversity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference74 articles.
1. Performance and Accountability Report (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2017); https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/plan/upload/2017par.pdf
2. Dobbin, F., Schrage, D. & Kalev, A. Rage against the iron cage: the varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80, 1014–1044 (2015).
3. Quillian, L., Pager, D., Hexel, O. & Midtbøen, A. H. Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10870–10875 (2017).
4. Chang, E. H. et al. The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7778–7783 (2019).
5. Cundiff, J. L., Ryuk, S. & Cech, K. Identity-safe or threatening? Perceptions of women-targeted diversity initiatives. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 21, 745–766 (2018).