Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cervical cancer screening participation is suboptimal in most settings. We assessed whether human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling may increase screening participation among long-term non-attenders in Norway.
Methods
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with participation as the primary outcome was initiated in the national cervical screening programme in March 2019. A random sample of 6000 women aged 35–69 years who had not attended screening for at least 10 years were randomised 1:1:1 to receive either (i) a reminder to attend regular screening (control), (ii) an offer to order a self-sampling kit (opt-in) for HPV testing or (iii) a self-sampling kit unsolicited (send-to-all) for HPV testing.
Results
Total participation was 4.8%, 17.0% and 27.7% among control, opt-in and send-to-all (P < 0.0001; participation difference (%) send-to-all vs. control: 22.9 (95%CI: 20.7, 25.2); opt-in vs. control: 12.3 (95%CI: 10.3, 14.2); send-to-all vs. opt-in: 10.7 (95% CI: 8.0, 13.3)). High-risk HPV was detected in 11.5% of self-samples and 9.2% of clinician-collected samples (P = 0.40). Most women (92.5%) who returned a positive self-sample attended the clinic for triage testing. Of the 933 women screened, 33 (3.5%) had CIN2 + (1.1%, 3.7%, 3.8% among control, opt-in, and send-to-all, respectively), and 11 (1.2%) had cervical cancer (0%, 1.2%, 1.3% among control, opt-in, send-to-all, respectively).
Conclusion
Opt-in and send-to-all self-sampling increased screening participation among long-term, higher-risk non-attenders.
Clinical trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03873376.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Lönnberg S, Hansen BT, Haldorsen T, Campbell S, Schee K, Nygård M. Cervical cancer prevented by screening: Long-term incidence trends by morphology in Norway. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:1758–64.
2. Haldorsen T, Skare GB, Steen R, Thoresen SO. Livmorhalskreft etter ti års offentlig koordinert screening. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening]. Tidskr NorLegefor. 2008;128:682–5.
3. Cancer Registry of Norway. Annual rapport 2019, Screening Activity and Results from the National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme, [Årsrapport 2019, Screeningaktivitet og resultater fra Livmorhalsprogrammet]. 2020. https://www.kreftregisteret.no/globalassets/livmorhalsprogrammet/rapporter/arsrapport-lp/arsrapport-livmorhalsprogrammet-2019v2_sept2021.pdf [Accessed 10 Feb, 2022].
4. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparen P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, et al. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:622–9.
5. Pedersen K, Burger EA, Campbell S, Nygård M, Aas E, Lönnberg S. Advancing the evaluation of cervical cancer screening: development and application of a longitudinal adherence metric. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27:1089–94.