How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

Author:

Long HannahORCID,Brooks Joanna M.,Harvie MichelleORCID,Maxwell AnthonyORCID,French David P.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background This is the first review to identify, appraise and synthesise women’s experiences of having a false-positive breast screening test result. Methods We systematically searched eight databases for qualitative research reporting women’s experiences of receiving a false-positive screening test result. Two reviewers independently screened articles. Eight papers reporting seven studies were included. Study quality was appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Results Women passively attended screening in order to prove their perceived good health. Consequently, being recalled was unexpected, shocking and disempowering: women felt without options. They endured great uncertainty and stress and sought clarity about their health (e.g. by scrutinising the wording of recall letters and conversations with healthcare professionals). Their result was accompanied by relief and welcome feelings of certainty about their health, but some received unclear explanations of their result, contributing to lasting breast cancer-related worry and an ongoing need for further reassurance. Conclusion The organisation of breast screening programmes may constrain choice for women: they became passive recipients. The way healthcare professionals verbally communicate results to women may contribute to lasting breast cancer-related worry. Women need more reassurance, emotional support and answers to their questions before and during screening assessment, and after receiving their result.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre

NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference43 articles.

1. Independent, U. K. Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. The Lancet 380, 1778–1786 (2012).

2. Gøtzsche, P. C. & Jørgensen, K. J. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD001877 (2013).

3. World Health Organisation (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast cancer screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (WHO, Lyon, France, 2002).

4. NHS Digital. Breast Screening Programme. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/pdf/m/f/breast_screening_programme__england__2016-17_-_report__v2.pdf, cited 2019 Dec 16, [2017]

5. Bolejko, A., Zackrisson, S., Hagell, P. & Wann‐Hansson, C. A roller coaster of emotions and sense–coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false‐positive screening mammography. J. Clin. Nursing 23, 2053–2062 (2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3