Emotion constructs and outcome measures following false positive breast screening test results: A systematic review of reporting clarity and selection rationale

Author:

Long Hannah A.1ORCID,Hindmarch Sarah1ORCID,Martindale John‐Paul2,Brooks Joanna M.1,Harvie Michelle3,French David P.1

Affiliation:

1. Manchester Centre for Health Psychology University of Manchester Manchester UK

2. School of Philosophy Psychology and Language Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

3. The Prevent Breast Cancer Unit Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

Abstract

AbstractObjective(i) To systematically identify constructs and outcome measures used to assess the emotional and mood impact of false positive breast screening test results; (ii) to appraise the reporting clarity and rationale for selecting constructs and outcome measures.MethodsDatabases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were systematically searched from 1970. Studies using standardised and non‐standardised outcome measures to evaluate the emotion or mood impact of false positive breast screening test results were eligible. A 15‐item coding scheme was devised to appraise articles on clarity and rationale for selected constructs and measures.ResultsForty‐seven articles were identified. The most investigated constructs were general anxiety and depression and disease‐specific anxiety and worry. Twenty‐two standardised general outcome questionnaire measures and three standardised disease‐specific outcome questionnaire measures were identified. Twenty articles used non‐standardised scales/items. Reporting of constructs and outcome measures was generally clear, but rationales for their selection were lacking. Anxiety was typically justified, but justification for depression was almost always absent. Practical and psychometric justification for selecting outcome measures was lacking, and theoretical rationale was absent.ConclusionsHeterogeneity in constructs and measures, coupled with unclear rationale for these, impedes a thorough understanding of why there are emotional effects of false positive screening test results. This may explain the repeated practice of investigating less relevant outcomes such as depression. There is need to develop a consensual conceptual model of and standardised approach to measuring emotional impact from cancer screening test results, to address heterogeneity and other known issues of interpreting an inconsistent evidence base.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference47 articles.

1. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review

2. National Health Service.Breast screening programme England 2018‐19: report.2020.https://files.digital.nhs.uk/0A/9D9F34/breast‐screening‐programme‐eng‐2018‐19‐report.pdf

3. Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms

4. The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3