Author:
Pettersen Emily,Shah Furqan A.,Ortiz-Catalan Max
Abstract
AbstractElectrical stimulation has been suggested as a means for promoting the direct structural and functional bonding of bone tissue to an artificial implant, known as osseointegration. Previous work has investigated the impact of electrical stimulation in different models, both in vitro and in vivo, using various electrode configurations for inducing an electric field with a wide range of stimulation parameters. However, there is no consensus on optimal electrode configuration nor stimulation parameters. Here, we investigated a novel approach of delivering electrical stimulation to a titanium implant using parameters clinically tested in a different application, namely peripheral nerve stimulation. We propose an in vitro model comprising of Ti6Al4V implants precultured with MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts, stimulated for 72 h at two different pulse amplitudes (10 µA and 20 µA) and at two different frequencies (50 Hz and 100 Hz). We found that asymmetric charge-balanced pulsed electrical stimulation improved cell survival and collagen production in a dose-dependent manner. Our findings suggest that pulsed electrical stimulation with characteristics similar to peripheral nerve stimulation has the potential to improve cell survival and may provide a promising approach to improve peri-implant bone healing, particularly to neuromusculoskeletal interfaces in which implanted electrodes are readily available.
Funder
Promobilia Foundation
Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning
IngaBritt and Arne Lundbergs Foundation
Swedish Innovation Agency
Swedish Research Council
European Commission
Chalmers University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Brånemark, R., Brånemark, P.-I., Rydevik, B. & Myers, R. R. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review and the VA San Diego Healthcare System. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 38, 175–181 (2001).
2. Thesleff, A., Brånemark, R., Håkansson, B. & Ortiz-Catalan, M. Biomechanical characterisation of bone-anchored implant systems for amputation limb prostheses: A systematic review. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 46(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-017-1976-4 (2018).
3. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O. & Brånemark, R. Self-contained neuromusculoskeletal arm prostheses. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(18), 1732–1738. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1917537 (2020).
4. Bodhak, S., Bose, S., Kinsel, W. C. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Investigation of in vitro bone cell adhesion and proliferation on Ti using direct current stimulation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 32(8), 2163–2168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.05.032 (2012).
5. Shah, F. A., Trobos, M., Thomsen, P. & Palmquist, A. Commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) versus titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) materials as bone anchored implants—Is one truly better than the other?. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 62, 960–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.032 (2016).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献