A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems
Author:
Keith David A.ORCID, Ferrer-Paris José R.ORCID, Nicholson EmilyORCID, Bishop Melanie J., Polidoro Beth A.ORCID, Ramirez-Llodra Eva, Tozer Mark G., Nel Jeanne L.ORCID, Mac Nally RalphORCID, Gregr Edward J.ORCID, Watermeyer Kate E., Essl Franz, Faber-Langendoen Don, Franklin JanetORCID, Lehmann Caroline E. R., Etter AndrésORCID, Roux Dirk J.ORCID, Stark Jonathan S.ORCID, Rowland Jessica A.ORCID, Brummitt Neil A., Fernandez-Arcaya Ulla C.ORCID, Suthers Iain M.ORCID, Wiser Susan K.ORCID, Donohue IanORCID, Jackson Leland J., Pennington R. Toby, Iliffe Thomas M., Gerovasileiou VasilisORCID, Giller PaulORCID, Robson Belinda J., Pettorelli Nathalie, Andrade AngelaORCID, Lindgaard Arild, Tahvanainen Teemu, Terauds Aleks, Chadwick Michael A.ORCID, Murray Nicholas J.ORCID, Moat JustinORCID, Pliscoff Patricio, Zager Irene, Kingsford Richard T.
Abstract
AbstractAs the United Nations develops a post-2020 global biodiversity framework for the Convention on Biological Diversity, attention is focusing on how new goals and targets for ecosystem conservation might serve its vision of ‘living in harmony with nature’1,2. Advancing dual imperatives to conserve biodiversity and sustain ecosystem services requires reliable and resilient generalizations and predictions about ecosystem responses to environmental change and management3. Ecosystems vary in their biota4, service provision5 and relative exposure to risks6, yet there is no globally consistent classification of ecosystems that reflects functional responses to change and management. This hampers progress on developing conservation targets and sustainability goals. Here we present the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Global Ecosystem Typology, a conceptually robust, scalable, spatially explicit approach for generalizations and predictions about functions, biota, risks and management remedies across the entire biosphere. The outcome of a major cross-disciplinary collaboration, this novel framework places all of Earth’s ecosystems into a unifying theoretical context to guide the transformation of ecosystem policy and management from global to local scales. This new information infrastructure will support knowledge transfer for ecosystem-specific management and restoration, globally standardized ecosystem risk assessments, natural capital accounting and progress on the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference59 articles.
1. Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. First Draft of the Post 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021). 2. Nicholson, E. et al. Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1338–1349 (2021). 3. Clark, J. S. et al. Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative. Science 293, 657–660 (2000). 4. Gibson, L. et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 378, 378–381 (2011). 5. Bordt, M. & Saner, M. A. Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments. One Ecosyst. 4, e31420 (2019).
Cited by
124 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|