Abstract
AbstractSchools start early in the morning all over the world, contrasting with adolescents’ late chronotype. Interestingly, lower academic performance (i.e. grades or qualifications) was associated with later chronotypes. However, it is unclear whether it is a direct effect of chronotype or because students attend school too early to perform at their best. Moreover, little is known about how this affects students’ academic success beyond their grades. To address this gap in knowledge, we studied how school timing and chronotype affect grade retention (i.e. repeat a year) in a unique sample of students randomly assigned to one of three different school timings (starting at 07:45, 12:40, or 17:20). Even when controlling for academic performance, we found that later chronotypes exhibit higher odds of grade retention only in the morning, but not in later school timings. Altogether, ensuring a better alignment between school timing and students’ biological rhythms might enhance future opportunities of adolescents.
Funder
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental Neuroscience,Education
Reference79 articles.
1. Roenneberg, T., Kumar, C. J. & Merrow, M. The human circadian clock entrains to sun time. Curr. Biol. 17, R44–R45 (2007).
2. Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M. & Roenneberg, T. Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiol. Int. 23, 497–509 (2006).
3. Casiraghi, L. P. et al. Human period-3 gene involvement in diurnal preference among Argentinean bipolar disorders patients. Sleep Sci. 3, 22–26 (2010).
4. Hirano, A. et al. A Cryptochrome 2 mutation yields advanced sleep phase in humans. eLife 5, e16695 (2016).
5. Patke, A. et al. Mutation of the human circadian clock gene CRY1 in familial delayed sleep phase disorder. Cell 169, 203–215.e13 (2017).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献