Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects
-
Published:2021-02-23
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:
-
ISSN:2041-1723
-
Container-title:Nature Communications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Commun
Author:
Clark James S.ORCID, Andrus Robert, Aubry-Kientz Melaine, Bergeron YvesORCID, Bogdziewicz MichalORCID, Bragg Don C., Brockway Dale, Cleavitt Natalie L., Cohen Susan, Courbaud Benoit, Daley Robert, Das Adrian J.ORCID, Dietze Michael, Fahey Timothy J., Fer Istem, Franklin Jerry F., Gehring Catherine A., Gilbert Gregory S.ORCID, Greenberg Cathryn H., Guo QinfengORCID, HilleRisLambers Janneke, Ibanez InesORCID, Johnstone Jill, Kilner Christopher L.ORCID, Knops Johannes, Koenig Walter D.ORCID, Kunstler Georges, LaMontagne Jalene M.ORCID, Legg Kristin L., Luongo Jordan, Lutz James A.ORCID, Macias Diana, McIntire Eliot J. B., Messaoud Yassine, Moore Christopher M., Moran Emily, Myers Jonathan A.ORCID, Myers Orrin B., Nunez ChaseORCID, Parmenter RobertORCID, Pearse Sam, Pearson ScottORCID, Poulton-Kamakura Renata, Ready Ethan, Redmond Miranda D., Reid Chantal D., Rodman Kyle C.ORCID, Scher C. Lane, Schlesinger William H., Schwantes Amanda M., Shanahan Erin, Sharma Shubhi, Steele Michael A., Stephenson Nathan L.ORCID, Sutton Samantha, Swenson Jennifer J., Swift Margaret, Veblen Thomas T.ORCID, Whipple Amy V., Whitham Thomas G., Wion Andreas P., Zhu KaiORCID, Zlotin Roman
Abstract
AbstractIndirect climate effects on tree fecundity that come through variation in size and growth (climate-condition interactions) are not currently part of models used to predict future forests. Trends in species abundances predicted from meta-analyses and species distribution models will be misleading if they depend on the conditions of individuals. Here we find from a synthesis of tree species in North America that climate-condition interactions dominate responses through two pathways, i) effects of growth that depend on climate, and ii) effects of climate that depend on tree size. Because tree fecundity first increases and then declines with size, climate change that stimulates growth promotes a shift of small trees to more fecund sizes, but the opposite can be true for large sizes. Change the depresses growth also affects fecundity. We find a biogeographic divide, with these interactions reducing fecundity in the West and increasing it in the East. Continental-scale responses of these forests are thus driven largely by indirect effects, recommending management for climate change that considers multiple demographic rates.
Funder
National Science Foundation National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference72 articles.
1. Schwantes, A. M. et al. Measuring canopy loss and climatic thresholds from an extreme drought along a fivefold precipitation gradient across texas. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 5120–5135 (2017). 2. Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395–402 (2017). 3. Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020). 4. Clark, J. S. et al. The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the united states. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2329–2352 (2016). 5. McDowell, N. et al. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science (in the press).
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|