Abstract
AbstractThe standard measure of distance in social networks – average shortest path length – assumes a model of “simple” contagion, in which people only need exposure to influence from one peer to adopt the contagion. However, many social phenomena are “complex” contagions, for which people need exposure to multiple peers before they adopt. Here, we show that the classical measure of path length fails to define network connectedness and node centrality for complex contagions. Centrality measures and seeding strategies based on the classical definition of path length frequently misidentify the network features that are most effective for spreading complex contagions. To address these issues, we derive measures of complex path length and complex centrality, which significantly improve the capacity to identify the network structures and central individuals best suited for spreading complex contagions. We validate our theory using empirical data on the spread of a microfinance program in 43 rural Indian villages.
Funder
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference53 articles.
1. Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973).
2. Watts, D. & Strogatz, S. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998).
3. Newman, M. Networks: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2010).
4. Milgram, S. The small-world problem. Psychol. Today 1, 61–67 (1967).
5. Watts, D. The ‘new’ science of networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 243–270 (2004).
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献