Negative social tipping dynamics resulting from and reinforcing Earth system destabilization
-
Published:2024-09-10
Issue:5
Volume:15
Page:1179-1206
-
ISSN:2190-4987
-
Container-title:Earth System Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Dynam.
Author:
Spaiser Viktoria, Juhola SirkkuORCID, Constantino Sara M., Guo Weisi, Watson Tabitha, Sillmann Jana, Craparo AlessandroORCID, Basel AshleighORCID, Bruun John T.ORCID, Krishnamurthy Krishna, Scheffran JürgenORCID, Pinho Patricia, Okpara Uche T.ORCID, Donges Jonathan F.ORCID, Bhowmik Avit, Yasseri TahaORCID, Safra de Campos Ricardo, Cumming Graeme S., Chenet HuguesORCID, Krampe Florian, Abrams Jesse F.ORCID, Dyke James G.ORCID, Rynders StefanieORCID, Aksenov YevgenyORCID, Spears Bryan M.
Abstract
Abstract. In recent years, research on normatively positive social tipping dynamics in response to the climate crisis has produced invaluable insights. In contrast, relatively little attention has been given to the potentially negative social tipping processes that might unfold due to an increasingly destabilized Earth system and to how they might in turn reinforce social and ecological destabilization dynamics and/or impede positive social change. In this paper, we discuss selected potential negative social tipping processes (anomie, radicalization and polarization, displacement, conflict, and financial destabilization) linked to Earth system destabilization. We draw on related research to understand the drivers and likelihood of these negative tipping dynamics, their potential effects on human societies and the Earth system, and the potential for cascading interactions (e.g. food insecurity and displacement) contributing to systemic risks. This first attempt to provide an explorative conceptualization and empirical account of potential negative social tipping dynamics linked to Earth system destabilization is intended to motivate further research into an under-studied area that is nonetheless crucial for our ability to respond to the climate crisis and for ensuring that positive social tipping dynamics are not averted by negative ones.
Funder
UK Research and Innovation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference298 articles.
1. Aasen, M.: The polarization of public concern about climate change in Norway, Clim. Policy, 17, 213–230, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1094727, 2017. 2. Abou-Chadi, T. and Krause, W.: The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties' Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach, Brit. J. Pol. Sci., 50, 829–847, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000029, 2020. 3. Abrahams, D.: Conflict in Abundance and Peacebuilding in Scarcity: Challenges and Opportunities in Addressing Climate Change and Conflict, World Dev., 132, 104998, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104998, 2020. 4. Abrutyn, S.: Toward a General Theory of Anomie: The Social Psychology of Disintegration, Arch. Eur. Sociol, 60, 109–136, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975619000043, 2019. 5. Achenbach, J.: Two mass killings a world apart share a common theme: “ecofascism”, The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/ (last access: 7 September 2024), 2019.
|
|