Abstract
AbstractPoor diets are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Exposure to low-quality food environments saturated with fast food outlets is hypothesized to negatively impact diet. However, food environment research has predominantly focused on static food environments around home neighborhoods and generated mixed findings. In this work, we leverage population-scale mobility data in the U.S. to examine 62M people’s visits to food outlets and evaluate how food choice is influenced by the food environments people are exposed to as they move through their daily routines. We find that a 10% increase in exposure to fast food outlets in mobile environments increases individuals’ odds of visitation by 20%. Using our results, we simulate multiple policy strategies for intervening on food environments to reduce fast-food outlet visits. This analysis suggests that optimal interventions are informed by spatial, temporal, and behavioral features and could have 2x to 4x larger effect than traditional interventions focused on home food environments.
Funder
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Agencia Estatal de Investigación
National Science Foundation
Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives, National Cancer Institute
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Hall, K. D. et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metab. 30, 67–77.e3 (2019).
2. Popkin, B. M. et al. Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 9, 462–470 (2021).
3. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP). Poor nutrition. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/factsheets/nutrition.htm. Accessed: 2022-06-04 (2022).
4. Afshin, A. et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (Lond., Engl.) 393, 1958–1972 (2019).
5. Yach, D., Hawkes, C., Gould, C. L. & Hofman, K. J. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. Jama 291, 2616–2622 (2004).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献