Abstract
AbstractThe misinformation effect occurs when people’s memory of an event is altered by subsequent inaccurate information. No study has systematically tested theories about the dynamics of human hippocampal representations during the three stages of misinformation-induced false memory. This study replicates behavioral results of the misinformation effect, and investigates the cross-stage pattern similarity in the hippocampus and cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results show item-specific hippocampal pattern similarity between original-event and post-event stages. During the memory-test stage, hippocampal representations of original information are weakened for true memory, whereas hippocampal representations of misinformation compete with original information to create false memory. When false memory occurs, this conflict is resolved by the lateral prefrontal cortex. Individuals’ memory traces of post-event information in the hippocampus predict false memory, whereas original information in the lateral parietal cortex predicts true memory. These findings support the multiple-trace model, and emphasize the reconstructive nature of human memory.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Young top notch talents of ten thousand talent program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference73 articles.
1. Schacter, D. L. & Loftus, E. F. Memory and law: What can cognitive neuroscience contribute? Nat. Neurosci. 16, 119–123 (2013).
2. Loftus, E. F. Our changeable memories: legal and practical implications. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 231–234 (2003).
3. Ayers, M. S. & Reder, L. M. A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 5, 1–21 (1998).
4. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. & Burns, H. J. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 4, 19–31 (1978).
5. Scheufele, D. A. & Krause, N. M. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7662–7669 (2019).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献