Abstract
Concerns about public misinformation in the United States—ranging from politics to science—are growing. Here, we provide an overview of how and why citizens become (and sometimes remain) misinformed about science. Our discussion focuses specifically on misinformation among individual citizens. However, it is impossible to understand individual information processing and acceptance without taking into account social networks, information ecologies, and other macro-level variables that provide important social context. Specifically, we show how being misinformed is a function of a person’s ability and motivation to spot falsehoods, but also of other group-level and societal factors that increase the chances of citizens to be exposed to correct(ive) information. We conclude by discussing a number of research areas—some of which echo themes of the 2017 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Communicating Science Effectively report—that will be particularly important for our future understanding of misinformation, specifically a systems approach to the problem of misinformation, the need for more systematic analyses of science communication in new media environments, and a (re)focusing on traditionally underserved audiences.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference96 articles.
1. Nuccitelli D (February 12, 2018) The EPA debunked Administrator Pruitt’s latest climate misinformation. The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/feb/12/the-epa-debunked-administrator-pruitts-latest-climate-misinformation. Accessed June 13, 2018.
2. Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community;Lewandowsky;Glob Environ Change,2015
3. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory:
Figure 1.
4. Lazer D (2017) Combating fake news: An agenda for research and action. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA), p 2.
5. Berelson BR Lazarsfeld PF McPhee WN (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign (The Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Cited by
516 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献