Abstract
AbstractSocial media has arguably shifted political agenda-setting power away from mainstream media onto politicians. Current U.S. President Trump’s reliance on Twitter is unprecedented, but the underlying implications for agenda setting are poorly understood. Using the president as a case study, we present evidence suggesting that President Trump’s use of Twitter diverts crucial media (The New York Times and ABC News) from topics that are potentially harmful to him. We find that increased media coverage of the Mueller investigation is immediately followed by Trump tweeting increasingly about unrelated issues. This increased activity, in turn, is followed by a reduction in coverage of the Mueller investigation—a finding that is consistent with the hypothesis that President Trump’s tweets may also successfully divert the media from topics that he considers threatening. The pattern is absent in placebo analyses involving Brexit coverage and several other topics that do not present a political risk to the president. Our results are robust to the inclusion of numerous control variables and examination of several alternative explanations, although the generality of the successful diversion must be established by further investigation.
Funder
Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council
UWA Business School’s Future Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference55 articles.
1. Roberts, M. E. Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall (Princeton University Press, 2018).
2. King, G., Pan, J. & Roberts, M. E. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 111, 484–501 (2017).
3. Applebaum, A. The new censors won’t delete your words—they’ll drown them out. https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/opinions/global-opinions/the-new-censors-wont-delete-your-words-theyll-drown-them-out/2019/02/08/c8a926a2-2b27-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html (2019).
4. King, G., Schneer, B. & White, A. How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science 358, 776–780 (2017).
5. McCombs, M. A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. J. Stud. 6, 543–557 (2005).
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献