Using the president’s tweets to understand political diversion in the age of social media

Author:

Lewandowsky StephanORCID,Jetter Michael,Ecker Ullrich K. H.

Abstract

AbstractSocial media has arguably shifted political agenda-setting power away from mainstream media onto politicians. Current U.S. President Trump’s reliance on Twitter is unprecedented, but the underlying implications for agenda setting are poorly understood. Using the president as a case study, we present evidence suggesting that President Trump’s use of Twitter diverts crucial media (The New York Times and ABC News) from topics that are potentially harmful to him. We find that increased media coverage of the Mueller investigation is immediately followed by Trump tweeting increasingly about unrelated issues. This increased activity, in turn, is followed by a reduction in coverage of the Mueller investigation—a finding that is consistent with the hypothesis that President Trump’s tweets may also successfully divert the media from topics that he considers threatening. The pattern is absent in placebo analyses involving Brexit coverage and several other topics that do not present a political risk to the president. Our results are robust to the inclusion of numerous control variables and examination of several alternative explanations, although the generality of the successful diversion must be established by further investigation.

Funder

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council

UWA Business School’s Future Fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry

Reference55 articles.

1. Roberts, M. E. Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall (Princeton University Press, 2018).

2. King, G., Pan, J. & Roberts, M. E. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 111, 484–501 (2017).

3. Applebaum, A. The new censors won’t delete your words—they’ll drown them out. https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/opinions/global-opinions/the-new-censors-wont-delete-your-words-theyll-drown-them-out/2019/02/08/c8a926a2-2b27-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html (2019).

4. King, G., Schneer, B. & White, A. How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science 358, 776–780 (2017).

5. McCombs, M. A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. J. Stud. 6, 543–557 (2005).

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3