Abstract
AbstractApproaching limitations of digital computing technologies have spurred research in neuromorphic and other unconventional approaches to computing. Here we argue that if we want to engineer unconventional computing systems in a systematic way, we need guidance from a formal theory that is different from the classical symbolic-algorithmic Turing machine theory. We propose a general strategy for developing such a theory, and within that general view, a specific approach that we call fluent computing. In contrast to Turing, who modeled computing processes from a top-down perspective as symbolic reasoning, we adopt the scientific paradigm of physics and model physical computing systems bottom-up by formalizing what can ultimately be measured in a physical computing system. This leads to an understanding of computing as the structuring of processes, while classical models of computing systems describe the processing of structures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference120 articles.
1. Andrae, A. S. G. & Edler, T. On global electricity usage of communication technology: trends to 2030. Challenges 6, 117–157 (2015).
2. Zhao, H. et al. A New Circular Vision for Electronics: Time for a Global Reboot. Report in Support of the United Nations E-waste Coalition, World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/a-new-circular-vision-for-electronics-time-for-a-global-reboot (2019).
3. Waldrop, M. M. More than Moore. Nature 530, 144–147 (2016).
4. Ebert, C. 50 years of software engineering: progress and perils. IEEE Softw. 35, 94–101 (2018).
5. Mead, C. Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proc. IEEE 78, 1629–1636 (1990).
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献