Abstract
AbstractHere we investigate how the conflicts between hazard reduction and economic interests have shaped the regulation of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) under the Authorization program of the European chemical regulation Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Since regulation starts with listing SVHCs on the Candidate List, we analyze the relative importance of toxicological properties, economic motivations, and available scientific knowledge on the probability of inclusion on the Candidate List. We find that the most important factor in whether a substance is listed is whether it is being produced in, or imported into, the European Economic Area (EEA), with the regulators less likely to place a substance on the list if it is currently being produced or imported in the EEA. This evidence suggests that regulators have listed chemicals of secondary importance leading to lesser than anticipated hazard reductions, either because production and imports had already ceased before the listing, or because the compound has never been produced or imported in the EEA at all.
Funder
FRAM Centre for Future Chemical Risk Assessment and Management at the University of Gothenburg
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (Swedish Research Council Formas) FRAM Centre for Future Chemical Risk Assessment and Management at the University of Gothenburg.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference32 articles.
1. EEA (European Environmental Agency). Environmental Indicator Report No.19/2018, in Support to the Monitoring of the Seventh Environment Action Programme (EEA, 2018).
2. World Health Organization. The Public Health Impact of Chemicals: Knowns and Unknowns. International Programme on Chemical Safety (World Health Organization, 2018).
3. Egeghy, P. P., Vallero, D. A. & Hubal, E. A. C. Exposure-based prioritization of chemicals for risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Policy 14, 950–964 (2011).
4. Wang, Z., Walker, G. W., Muir, D. C. & Nagatani-Yoshida, K. Toward a global understanding of chemical pollution: a first comprehensive analysis of national and regional chemical inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 2575–2584 (2020).
5. Gold, S. C. & Wagner, W. E. Filling gaps in science exposes gaps in chemical regulation. Science 368, 1066–1068 (2020).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献