Abstract
AbstractPlant production systems worldwide are struggling to meet the diverse and increasing needs of humankind while also facing challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This, combined with the desirable transition from the use of conventional pesticides to more sustainable plant protection solutions, has led to an urgent, and increasing, need for low-risk plant protection products (PPPs) to be developed, applied, and integrated into management practices across all types of plant production systems. Despite a high demand from end users and consumers together with joint political goals at the EU level to replace conventional pesticides, the number of low-risk PPPs on the European market remains low, in comparison to synthetic agrochemicals. In this review, we summarize knowledge about the policy, technical, and administrative issues hampering the process of bringing new low-risk PPPs to the European market. We present an overview of the challenges in using the low-risk PPPs that are currently available within the EU agricultural, horticultural, and forestry sectors. We describe the variation in modes of action and the limitations associated with different application techniques and give concrete examples of problems and solutions from Swedish plant production sectors, in contrast to global perspectives as demonstrated by examples from African agriculture. Finally, we conclude that trans-sectoral, multi-actor approaches are required and provide suggestions on how to address the remaining knowledge gaps related to efficiency, application, and economics of low-risk PPP use in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) solutions for plant protection to improve future food security in Europe.
Funder
Vetenskapsrådet
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference153 articles.
1. Akutse KS, Subramanian S, Maniania NK et al (2020) Biopesticide research and product development in Africa for sustainable agriculture and food security – experiences from the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe). Front Sustain Food Syst 4:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.563016
2. Alcalá Herrera R, Cotes B, Agustí N et al (2022) Using flower strips to promote green lacewings to control cabbage insect pests. J Pest Sci 95:669–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01419-7
3. Allmyr M, Björkman M, Hallgren S, et al (2019) Hinder för ökad användning av alternativa bekämpningsmedel. Jordbruksverket RA 19:3. https://webbutiken.jordbruksverket.se/sv/artiklar/ra193.html. Accessed 7 February 2024
4. Amoabeng BW, Gurr GM, Gitau CW, Stevenson PC (2014) Cost:benefit analysis of botanical insecticide use in cabbage: implications for smallholder farmers in developing countries. Crop Prot 57:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.11.019
5. Andersson L, Jansson J, Jonsson P (2022) Växtskyddsmedel med begränsad risk. Jordbruksverket OVR615. https://webbutiken.jordbruksverket.se/sv/artiklar/ovr615.html. Accessed 7 February 2024
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献