Abstract
AbstractIt has long been proposed that flying and swimming animals could exploit neighbour-induced flows. Despite this it is still not clear whether, and if so how, schooling fish coordinate their movement to benefit from the vortices shed by others. To address this we developed bio-mimetic fish-like robots which allow us to measure directly the energy consumption associated with swimming together in pairs (the most common natural configuration in schooling fish). We find that followers, in any relative position to a near-neighbour, could obtain hydrodynamic benefits if they exhibit a tailbeat phase difference that varies linearly with front-back distance, a strategy we term ‘vortex phase matching’. Experiments with pairs of freely-swimming fish reveal that followers exhibit this strategy, and that doing so requires neither a functioning visual nor lateral line system. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that fish typically, but not exclusively, use vortex phase matching to save energy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry
Reference56 articles.
1. Breder, C. M. Vortices and fish schools. Zoologica 50, 97–114 (1965).
2. Belyayev, V. V. & Zuyev, G. V. Hydrodynamic hypothesis of school formation in fishes. Prob. Ichthyol. 9, 578–584 (1969).
3. Weihs, D. Hydromechanics of fish schooling. Nature 241, 290–291 (1973).
4. Liao, J. C. A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362, 1973–1993 (2007).
5. Gopalkrishnan, R., Triantafyllou, M. S., Triantafyllou, G. S. & Barrett, D. Active vorticity control in a shear flow using a flapping foil. J. Fluid Mech. 274, 1 (1994).
Cited by
96 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献