Microfluidic capillary networks are more sensitive than ektacytometry to the decline of red blood cell deformability induced by storage

Author:

Piety Nathaniel Z.,Stutz Julianne,Yilmaz Nida,Xia Hui,Yoshida Tatsuro,Shevkoplyas Sergey S.

Abstract

AbstractEktacytometry has been the primary method for evaluating deformability of red blood cells (RBCs) in both research and clinical settings. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the flow of RBCs through a network of microfluidic capillaries could provide a more sensitive assessment of the progressive impairment of RBC deformability during hypothermic storage than ektacytometry. RBC units (n = 9) were split in half, with one half stored under standard (normoxic) conditions and the other half stored hypoxically, for up to 6 weeks. RBC deformability was measured weekly using two microfluidic devices, an artificial microvascular network (AMVN) and a multiplexed microcapillary network (MMCN), and two commercially available ektacytometers (RheoScan-D and LORRCA). By week 6, the elongation indexes measured with RheoScan-D and LORRCA decreased by 5.8–7.1% (5.4–6.9% for hypoxic storage). Over the same storage duration, the AMVN perfusion rate declined by 27.5% (24.5% for hypoxic) and the MMCN perfusion rate declined by 49.0% (42.4% for hypoxic). Unlike ektacytometry, both AMVN and MMCN measurements showed statistically significant differences between the two conditions after 1 week of storage. RBC morphology deteriorated continuously with the fraction of irreversibly-damaged (spherical) cells increasing significantly faster for normoxic than for hypoxic storage. Consequently, the number of MMCN capillary plugging events and the time MMCN capillaries spent plugged was consistently lower for hypoxic than for normoxic storage. These data suggest that capillary networks are significantly more sensitive to both the overall storage-induced decline of RBC deformability, and to the differences between the two storage conditions, than ektacytometry.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3