Author:
Noack Marcus M.,Doerk Gregory S.,Li Ruipeng,Streit Jason K.,Vaia Richard A.,Yager Kevin G.,Fukuto Masafumi
Abstract
AbstractA majority of experimental disciplines face the challenge of exploring large and high-dimensional parameter spaces in search of new scientific discoveries. Materials science is no exception; the wide variety of synthesis, processing, and environmental conditions that influence material properties gives rise to particularly vast parameter spaces. Recent advances have led to an increase in the efficiency of materials discovery by increasingly automating the exploration processes. Methods for autonomous experimentation have become more sophisticated recently, allowing for multi-dimensional parameter spaces to be explored efficiently and with minimal human intervention, thereby liberating the scientists to focus on interpretations and big-picture decisions. Gaussian process regression (GPR) techniques have emerged as the method of choice for steering many classes of experiments. We have recently demonstrated the positive impact of GPR-driven decision-making algorithms on autonomously-steered experiments at a synchrotron beamline. However, due to the complexity of the experiments, GPR often cannot be used in its most basic form, but rather has to be tuned to account for the special requirements of the experiments. Two requirements seem to be of particular importance, namely inhomogeneous measurement noise (input-dependent or non-i.i.d.) and anisotropic kernel functions, which are the two concepts that we tackle in this paper. Our synthetic and experimental tests demonstrate the importance of both concepts for experiments in materials science and the benefits that result from including them in the autonomous decision-making process.
Funder
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Air Force Research Laboratory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Habib, S. et al. Ascr/hep exascale requirements review report. arXiv preprintarXiv:1603.09303 (2016).
2. Gerber, R. et al. Crosscut report: exascale requirements reviews, march 9–10, 2017–tysons corner, virginia. an office of science review sponsored by: advanced scientific computing research, basic energy sciences, biological and environmental research, fusion energy sciences, high energy physics, nuclear physics. Technical report, Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Argonne (2018).
3. Almgren, A. et al. Advanced scientific computing research exascale requirements review. an office of science review sponsored by advanced scientific computing research, september 27-29, 2016, Rockville, Maryland. Technical report, Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Argonne Leadership (2017).
4. Thayer, J. et al. Data processing at the linac coherent light source. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 1st Annual Workshop on Large-scale Experiment-in-the-Loop Computing (XLOOP), 32–37 (IEEE, 2019).
5. Pilania, G., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Rajasekaran, S. & Ramprasad, R. Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 3, 2810 (2013).
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献