Author:
Fritsch Clémentine,Appenzeller Brice,Burkart Louisiane,Coeurdassier Michael,Scheifler Renaud,Raoul Francis,Driget Vincent,Powolny Thibaut,Gagnaison Candice,Rieffel Dominique,Afonso Eve,Goydadin Anne-Claude,Hardy Emilie M.,Palazzi Paul,Schaeffer Charline,Gaba Sabrina,Bretagnolle Vincent,Bertrand Colette,Pelosi Céline
Abstract
AbstractKnowledge gaps regarding the potential role of pesticides in the loss of agricultural biodiversity worldwide and mixture-related issues hamper proper risk assessment of unintentional impacts of pesticides, rendering essential the monitoring of wildlife exposure to these compounds. Free-ranging mammal exposure to legacy (Banned and Restricted: BRPs) and currently used (CUPs) pesticides was investigated, testing the hypotheses of: (1) a background bioaccumulation for BRPs whereas a “hot-spot” pattern for CUPs, (2) different contamination profiles between carnivores and granivores/omnivores, and (3) the role of non-treated areas as refuges towards exposure to CUPs. Apodemus mice (omnivore) and Crocidura shrews (insectivore) were sampled over two French agricultural landscapes (n = 93). The concentrations of 140 parent chemicals and metabolites were screened in hair samples. A total of 112 compounds were detected, showing small mammal exposure to fungicides, herbicides and insecticides with 32 to 65 residues detected per individual (13–26 BRPs and 18–41 CUPs). Detection frequencies exceeded 75% of individuals for 13 BRPs and 25 CUPs. Concentrations above 10 ng/g were quantified for 7 BRPs and 29 CUPs (in 46% and 72% of individuals, respectively), and above 100 ng/g for 10 CUPs (in 22% of individuals). Contamination (number of compounds or concentrations) was overall higher in shrews than rodents and higher in animals captured in hedgerows and cereal crops than in grasslands, but did not differ significantly between conventional and organic farming. A general, ubiquitous contamination by legacy and current pesticides was shown, raising issues about exposure pathways and impacts on ecosystems. We propose a concept referred to as “biowidening”, depicting an increase of compound diversity at higher trophic levels. This work suggests that wildlife exposure to pesticide mixtures is a rule rather than an exception, highlighting the need for consideration of the exposome concept and questioning appropriateness of current risk assessment and mitigation processes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference99 articles.
1. Rattner, B. A. History of wildlife toxicology. Ecotoxicology 18, 773–783 (2009).
2. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (Text with EEA relevance). 71–86 (2009).
3. McGrath, P. F. Politics meets Science: The case of neonicotinoid insecticides in Europe. Surveys Perspect. Integr. Environ. Society 7, 1–10 (2014).
4. EFSA. How Europe ensures pesticides are safe. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/interactive-pages/pesticides-authorisation/PesticidesAuthorisation (2020).
Accessed 13 February 2020.
5. US EPA. Pesticides-Pesticide Regulation-Protecting Health & the Environment. https://www.epa.gov/pesticides (2020). Accessed 13 February 2020.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献