Author:
Skornitzke Stephan,Vats Neha,Kopytova Taisiya,Tong Elizabeth Wai Yee,Hofbauer Tobias,Weber Tim Frederik,Rehnitz Christoph,von Stackelberg Oyunbileg,Maier-Hein Klaus,Stiller Wolfram,Biederer Jürgen,Kauczor Hans-Ulrich,Heußel Claus-Peter,Wielpütz Mark,Palm Viktoria
Abstract
AbstractAsynchronous calibration could allow opportunistic screening based on routine CT for early osteoporosis detection. In this phantom study, a bone mineral density (BMD) calibration phantom and multi-energy CT (MECT) phantom were imaged on eight different CT scanners with multiple tube voltages (80–150 kVp) and image reconstruction settings (e.g. soft/hard kernel). Reference values for asynchronous BMD estimation were calculated from the BMD-phantom and validated with six calcium composite inserts of the MECT-phantom with known ground truth. Relative errors/changes in estimated BMD were calculated and investigated for influence of tube voltage, CT scanner and reconstruction setting. Reference values for 282 acquisitions were determined, resulting in an average relative error between calculated BMD and ground truth of − 9.2% ± 14.0% with a strong correlation (R2 = 0.99; p < 0.0001). Tube voltage and CT scanner had a significant effect on calculated BMD (p < 0.0001), with relative differences in BMD of 3.8% ± 28.2% when adapting reference values for tube voltage, − 5.6% ± 9.2% for CT scanner and 0.2% ± 0.2% for reconstruction setting, respectively. Differences in BMD were small when using reference values from a different CT scanner of the same model (0.0% ± 1.4%). Asynchronous phantom-based calibration is feasible for opportunistic BMD assessment based on CT images with reference values adapted for tube voltage and CT scanner model.
Funder
State Ministry of Baden-Wuerttemberg for Sciences, Research and Arts, Germany
Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg der Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Prevention, W. S. G. on, Osteoporosis, M. of & Organization, W. H. Prevention and management of osteoporosis: Report of a WHO scientific group. (World Health Organization: 2003).
2. Löffler, M. T. et al. Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA. Eur. Radiol. 29, 4980–4989 (2019).
3. Adachi, J. D. et al. The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 3, 1–6 (2002).
4. Kanis, J. A. et al. A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone 42, 467–475 (2008).
5. F Cosman et al 2014 Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 25 2359 2381
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献