Author:
Lenhart Jan,Richter Tobias,Appel Markus,Mar Raymond A.
Abstract
Abstract
Reading is a popular leisure activity for children, teenagers, and adults. Several theories agree that reading might improve social cognition, but the empirical evidence remains tentative, with research on adolescents especially lacking. We employed a very large, and nationally representative, longitudinal dataset from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany to examine this hypothesis. Specifically, we tested whether reading prospectively predicted future self-reported prosocial behavior and social adjustment in adolescents, controlling for a number of covariates. Two-way cross-lagged panel analyses probed the longitudinal relationship between leisure reading and these social outcomes from Grade 6 to Grade 9. In addition, we examined the effect of cumulative reading experience across Grades 5–8 on future social outcomes, using structural equation modeling. We also explored the unique contributions of cumulative reading experience in different literary genres (classic literature, popular literature, nonfiction, comic books). Cumulative reading in general did not predict future prosocial behavior and social adjustment. However, cumulative reading of modern classic literature was positively associated with later prosocial behavior and social adjustment.
Protocol registration
The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 08 November 2021. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KSWY7.
Funder
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference83 articles.
1. JIM-Studie 2019. Jugend, Information, Medien. [JIM-study 2019. Adolescence, information, media], (2019).
2. Mol, S. E. & Bus, A. G. To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychol. Bull. 137, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890 (2011).
3. Keen, S. Empathy and the Novel (Oxford University Press, 2007).
4. Oatley, K. Theory of mind and theory of minds in literature. In Theory of Mind in Literature (eds Leverage, P. et al.) 13–26 (Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2014).
5. Hakemulder, J. The Moral Laboratory. Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-Concept (John Benjamins Publishing, 2000).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献