ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations
-
Published:2023-09-15
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Fütterer TimORCID, Fischer ChristianORCID, Alekseeva AnastasiiaORCID, Chen XiaobinORCID, Tate TamaraORCID, Warschauer MarkORCID, Gerjets PeterORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe release and rapid diffusion of ChatGPT have caught the attention of educators worldwide. Some educators are enthusiastic about its potential to support learning. Others are concerned about how it might circumvent learning opportunities or contribute to misinformation. To better understand reactions about ChatGPT concerning education, we analyzed Twitter data (16,830,997 tweets from 5,541,457 users). Based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis, we provide an overview of global perceptions and reactions to ChatGPT regarding education. ChatGPT triggered a massive response on Twitter, with education being the most tweeted content topic. Topics ranged from specific (e.g., cheating) to broad (e.g., opportunities), which were discussed with mixed sentiment. We traced that authority decisions may influence public opinions. We discussed that the average reaction on Twitter (e.g., using ChatGPT to cheat in exams) differs from discussions in which education and teaching–learning researchers are likely to be more interested (e.g., ChatGPT as an intelligent learning partner). This study provides insights into people's reactions when new groundbreaking technology is released and implications for scientific and policy communication in rapidly changing circumstances.
Funder
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference57 articles.
1. UNESCO. Beijing Consensus on artificial intelligence and education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2019). 2. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Kasneci, G. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Indiv. Diff. 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 (2023). 3. Warren, T. Microsoft to demo its new ChatGPT-like AI in Word, PowerPoint, and Outlook soon. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/10/23593980/microsoft-bing-chatgpt-ai-teams-outlook-integration (2023). 4. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 (2023). 5. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press (2010).
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|