Author:
Falzon Laura C.,Ogola Joseph G.,Odinga Christian O.,Naboyshchikov Leonid,Fèvre Eric M.,Berezowski John
Abstract
AbstractGlobally, meat inspection provides data for animal health surveillance. However, paper-based recording of data is often not reported through to higher authorities in sufficient detail. We trialled the use of an electronic meat inspection form in Kenyan slaughterhouses, in lieu of the currently used paper-based format. Meat inspectors in two ruminant slaughterhouses completed and submitted an electronic report for each animal slaughtered at their facility. The reports, which captured information on the animal demographics and any eventual condemnations, were stored in a central database and available in real-time. A stakeholder meeting was held towards the end of the study. Over the 2.75 year study period, 16,386 reports were submitted; a downward linear trend in the monthly submissions was noted. There was a week effect, whereby more reports were submitted on the market day. Of the slaughtered animals, 23% had at least a partial condemnation. The most frequently condemned organs were the liver, lungs and intestines; the primary reasons for condemnations were parasitic conditions. Lack of feedback and difficulty capturing animal origin information were the primary challenges highlighted. The study demonstrated that electronic data capture is feasible in such challenging environments, thereby improving the timeliness and resolution of the data collected.
Funder
University of Liverpool Institute of Infection and Global Health Research Pump Priming Fund
Institute of Infection and Global Health Postdoctoral Research Support Grant
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Dowell, S. F., Blazes, D. & Desmond-Hellmann, S. Four steps to precision public health. Nature 540, 189–191 (2016).
2. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic Diseases (ed. Keusch, G.T. et al.) 1–312 (The National Academies Press, 2009).
3. Hattendorf, J., Bardosh, K.L. & Zinsstag, J. One Health and its practical implications for surveillance of endemic zoonotic diseases in resource limited settings. Acta Trop. 165, 268–273 (2017).
4. Bell, R. G. Development of the principles and practices of meat hygiene: A microbiologist’s perspective. Food Control 4, 134–140 (1993).
5. Lynch, J. A. & Silva, P. Integrating animal health and food safety surveillance data from slaughterhouse control. Rev. Sci. Tech. 32, 409–416 (2013).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献