Relationship between ideology and language in the Catalan independence context

Author:

Atienza-Barthelemy JuliaORCID,Martin-Gutierrez SamuelORCID,Losada Juan C.ORCID,Benito Rosa M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractPolitical polarization generates strong effects on society, driving controversial debates and influencing the institutions. Territorial disputes are one of the most important polarized scenarios and have been consistently related to the use of language. In this work, we analyzed the opinion and language distributions of a particular territorial dispute around the independence of Catalonia through Twitter data. We infer a continuous opinion distribution by applying a model based on retweet interactions, previously detecting elite users with fixed and antagonist opinions. The resulting distribution presents a mainly bimodal behavior with an intermediate third pole that shows a less polarized society with the presence of not only antagonist opinions. We find that the more active, engaged and influential users hold more extreme positions. Also we prove that there is a clear relationship between political positions and the use of language, showing that against independence users speak mainly Spanish while pro-independence users speak Catalan and Spanish almost indistinctly. However, the third pole, closer in political opinion to the pro-independence pole, behaves similarly to the against-independence one concerning the use of language.

Funder

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference33 articles.

1. Epstein, D. & Graham, J. D. Polarized politics and policy consequences (Rand Corporation, 2007).

2. Persily, N. Solutions to political polarization in America (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

3. Dalton, R. J. The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies 41, 899–920 (2008).

4. Binder, S. A. Going nowhere: A gridlocked congress? The Brookings Review 18, 16–19 (2000).

5. Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T. & Tilley, J. Divided by the vote: Affective polarization in the wake of brexit. American Political Science Association, Boston (2018).

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3