Affiliation:
1. University of California, Irvine
Abstract
Previous research claims that the number of parties affects the representation of social cleavages in voting behavior, election turnout, patterns of political conflict, and other party system effects. This article argues that research typically counts the quantity of parties and that often the more important property is the quality of party competition—the polarization of political parties within a party system. The author first discusses why polarization is important to study. Second, the author provides a new measurement of party system polarization based on voter perceptions of party positions in the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, which includes more than 50 separate elections from established and developing democracies. Third, the author compares party polarization and party fractionalization as influences on cleavage-based and ideological voting and as predictors of turnout levels. The finding is that party polarization is empirically more important in explaining these outcomes.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference36 articles.
1. A Unified Theory of Party Competition
2. Turnout in Electoral Democracies
3. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change
4. Caul, M. & Gray, M. (2000). From platform declarations to policy outcomes . In R. Dalton & M. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans (pp. 208-237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems
Cited by
476 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献