Author:
Hong Joon-Ki,Lee Jae-Bong,Ramayo-Caldas Yuliaxis,Kim Si-Dong,Cho Eun-Seok,Kim Young-Sin,Cho Kyu-Ho,Lee Deuk-Hwan,Park Hee-Bok
Abstract
AbstractIn livestock social interactions, social genetic effects (SGE) represent associations between phenotype of one individual and genotype of another. Such associations occur when the trait of interest is affected by transmissible phenotypes of social partners. The aim of this study was to estimate SGE and direct genetic effects (DGE, genetic effects of an individual on its own phenotype) on average daily gain (ADG) in Landrace pigs, and to conduct single-step genome-wide association study using SGE and DGE as dependent variables to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and their positional candidate genes. A total of 1,041 Landrace pigs were genotyped using the Porcine SNP 60K BeadChip. Estimates of the two effects were obtained using an extended animal model. The SGE contributed 16% of the total heritable variation of ADG. The total heritability estimated by the extended animal model including both SGE and DGE was 0.52. The single-step genome-wide association study identified a total of 23 QTL windows for the SGE on ADG distributed across three chromosomes (i.e., SSC1, SSC2, and SSC6). Positional candidate genes within these QTL regions included PRDM13, MAP3K7, CNR1, HTR1E, IL4, IL5, IL13, KIF3A, EFHD2, SLC38A7, mTOR, CNOT1, PLCB2, GABRR1, and GABRR2, which have biological roles in neuropsychiatric processes. The results of biological pathway and gene network analyses also support the association of the neuropsychiatric processes with SGE on ADG in pigs. Additionally, a total of 11 QTL windows for DGE on ADG in SSC2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 17 were detected with positional candidate genes such as ARL15. We found a putative pleotropic QTL for both SGE and DGE on ADG on SSC6. Our results in this study provide important insights that can help facilitate a better understanding of the molecular basis of SGE for socially affected traits.
Funder
Rural Development Administration
Kongju National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Ellen, E. D. et al. The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock. Front. Genet. 5, 377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00377 (2014).
2. Griffing, B. Selection in reference to biological groups I Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 127–139 (1967).
3. Henderson, C. R. Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding (University of Guelph Press, Guelph, 1984).
4. Muir, W. M. a. S., A. Incorporation of competitive effects in breeding programs to improve productivity and animal well being. In 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France (2002).
5. Muir, W. M. Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs. Genetics 170, 1247–1259. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.035956 (2005).