Abstract
AbstractThe relative benefits of group foraging change as animals grow. Metabolic requirements, competitive abilities and predation risk are often allometric and influenced by group size. How individuals optimise costs and benefits as they grow can strongly influence consumption patterns. The shoaling fish Sarpa salpa is the principal herbivore of temperate Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows. We used in-situ observations to describe how ontogeny influenced S. salpa individual feeding behaviour, shoaling behaviour and group foraging strategies, and its potential consequences to seagrass meadows. Shoaling was strongly influenced by body length: shoals were highly length-assorted and there was a clear positive relationship between body length and shoal size. Foraging strategies changed dramatically with shoal size. Small shoals foraged simultaneously and scattered over large areas. In contrast, larger shoals (made of larger individuals) employed a potentially cooperative strategy where individuals fed rotationally and focused in smaller areas for longer times (spot feeding). Thus, as individuals grew, they increased their potential impact as well, not merely because they consumed more, but because they formed larger shoals capable of considerably concentrating their grazing within the landscape. Our results indicate that ontogenetic shifts in group foraging strategies can have large ecosystem-wide consequences when the species is an important ecosystem modifier.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Clark, W. & Mangel, M. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor. Popul. Biol. 75, 45–75 (1986).
2. Bertram, B. C. R. Living in groups: predators and prey. in Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach 221–248 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1978).
3. Svanbäck, R. & Bolnick, D. I. Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 839–844 (2007).
4. Ward, P. & Zahavi, A. The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information-centres” for food-finding. Ibis (Lond. 1859) 115, 517–534 (1973).
5. Arsenault, R. & Owen-smith, N. Facilitation versus competition in grazing herbivore. Oikos 97, 313–318 (2014).
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献