Abstract
AbstractThe use of underwater video techniques has expanded rapidly in ecological studies and is particularly desirable in protected areas since the method does not impact the habitat or remove fish. The Mediterranean Sea is a biodiversity hotspot under high anthropogenic pressure and consequently, non-destructive and non-extractive techniques for fish monitoring are advantageous. Here, we review 110 publications that used underwater video in fish-related studies in the Mediterranean basin. The most common technique used in the Mediterranean Sea was Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV) (33%), followed by Remote Underwater Video (RUV) systems (20%), Diver Operated Video (DOV) systems (20%) and Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) systems (19%). Approximately one third of the studies used an additional sampling method, such as fisheries-based or molecular methods with the aim to compare the surveying effectiveness or produce complementary data. The most frequent objectives of the reviewed studies were related to fish community structure, i.e., focusing on community wide metrics such as abundance and biodiversity, or behavioral analyses, while the most commonly studied environments were those of the western Mediterranean and shallow waters, usually involving sandy or rocky reef habitats. Sampling protocols differed widely among studies with transect lengths, soak times and baits all varying. Future research should focus on the least studied parts of the region, such as the eastern and southern Mediterranean Sea and deep-sea habitats. Finally, the development of standardized sampling protocols is recommended to ensure that data are comparable among studies.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference173 articles.
1. Addis P, Cau A, Massutí E, Merella P, Sinopoli M, Andaloro F (2016) Spatial and temporal changes in the assemblage structure of fishes associated to fish aggregation devices in the Western Mediterranean. Aquat Living Resour 19:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2006018
2. Aglieri G, Baillie C, Mariani S, Cattano C, Calò A, Turco G, Spatafora D, Di Franco A, Di Lorenzo M, Guidetti P, Milazzo M (2021) Environmental DNA effectively captures functional diversity of coastal fish communities. Mol Ecol 30:3127–3139. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15661
3. Aguilar R, Garcia S, Perry AL, Alvarez H, Blanco J, Bitar G (2019, January) The bathymetric distribution of fish and other key benthic species and communities in Lebanese submarine canyons. 2nd Mediterranean symposium on the conservation of dark habitats. Antalya, Turkey (pp. 5–12).
4. Aguzzi J, Mànuel A, Condal F, Guillén J, Nogueras M, del Rio J, Costa C, Menesatti P, Puig P, Sardà F, Toma D, Palanques A (2011) The New Seafloor Observatory (OBSEA) for Remote and Long-Term Coastal Ecosystem Monitoring. Sensors 11:5850–5872. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110605850
5. Aguzzi J, Sbragaglia V, Santamaría G, Del Río J, Sardà F, Nogueras M, Manuel A (2013) Daily activity rhythms in temperate coastal fishes: insights from cabled observatory video monitoring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 486:223–236. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10399
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献