Author:
Kashyap Pankhi,Shivgan Kajal,Patil Sheetal,Raja B. Ramana,Mahajan Sagar,Banerjee Sauvik,Tallur Siddharth
Abstract
AbstractFueled by the rapid development of machine learning (ML) and greater access to cloud computing and graphics processing units, various deep learning based models have been proposed for improving performance of ultrasonic guided wave structural health monitoring (GW-SHM) systems, especially to counter complexity and heterogeneity in data due to varying environmental factors (e.g., temperature) and types of damages. Such models typically comprise of millions of trainable parameters, and therefore add to cost of deployment due to requirements of cloud connectivity and processing, thus limiting the scale of deployment of GW-SHM. In this work, we propose an alternative solution that leverages TinyML framework for development of light-weight ML models that could be directly deployed on embedded edge devices. The utility of our solution is illustrated by presenting an unsupervised learning framework for damage detection in honeycomb composite sandwich structure with disbond and delamination type of damages, validated using data generated by finite element simulations and experiments performed at various temperatures in the range 0–90 °C. We demonstrate a fully-integrated solution using a Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA for data acquisition and control, and edge-inference of damage. Despite the limited number of features, the lightweight model shows reasonably high accuracy, thereby enabling detection of small size defects with improved sensitivity on an edge device for online GW-SHM.
Funder
Indian Space Research Organisation
Science and Engineering Research Board
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Mitra, M. & Gopalakrishnan, S. Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Mater. Struct. 25, 053001 (2016).
2. Randall, R. B. Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring: Industrial, Automotive and Aerospace Applications (Wiley, 2021).
3. Cawley, P. A development strategy for structural health monitoring applications. J. Nondestr. Eval. Diagn. Progn. Eng. Syst. 4, 041012 (2021).
4. Mariani, S., Heinlein, S. & Cawley, P. Compensation for temperature-dependent phase and velocity of guided wave signals in baseline subtraction for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 19, 26–47 (2020).
5. Bao, Y. & Li, H. Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 20, 1353–1372 (2021).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献