Author:
Wang Hao,Luo Peng,Wu Yimeng
Abstract
AbstractThe need for emergency medical services increased drastically during disaster relief. Poor location selection of emergency medical facilities may harm the interests of healthcare workers and patients, leading to unnecessary waste of costs. It involves multiple stakeholders' interests, a typical multi-criteria decision-making problem. Based on multiple-criteria decision-making technology, most current location selection decisions methods comprehensively consider the evaluation criteria of "issue" and "problem" simultaneously and establish mathematical models to achieve the results. Such methods are difficult to take into account the influence of different attribute factors on the final location selection results in practice. Therefore, in this study, we used the WSR methodology as a guide to divide the factors of location selection into "Wuli", "Shili" and "Renli", and proposed the WSR methodology-based multi-criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework for selecting the appropriate location for emergency medical facilities. The integrated framework consists of the Entropy Weight Method, Best–Worst Method, and interval type‐2 fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodologies. Combined with the comparative analysis of actual cases, the results under the guidance of this framework were consistent with practicalities. Also, the sensitivity analysis showed that the location selection ranking fluctuations were not apparent with the fluctuation of criteria weights. Wherefore, the validation of the proposed method's effectiveness, feasibility, and robustness was proved, which provided a valuable reference for the location selection of emergency medical facilities.
Funder
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
The program of China Scholarships Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Mahendradhata, Y. et al. The capacity of the Indonesian healthcare system to respond to COVID-19. Front. Public Health 9, 649819 (2021).
2. Hui, D. S. et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health—The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 91, 264–266 (2020).
3. Yin, G. et al. The COVID-19 run on medical resources in Wuhan China: Causes, consequences and lessons. Multidiscip. Digit. Publish. Inst. 9(10), 1362 (2021).
4. Verhagen, M.D., Brazel, D.M., Dowd, J.B. et al. Mapping hospital demand: demographics, spatial variation, and the risk of “hospital deserts” during COVID-19 in England and Wales. OSF Preprints (2020).
5. Zhang, L., Kang, P. & Gu, H. “Two Phases and Three Sections" Research on Earthquake Emergency Medical Rescue: Based on Empirical Analysis of Yushu Earthquake Medical Rescue. (Science Press, 2016).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献