Author:
Zhang Zhengyang,Abdullah Meshal J.,Xu Guochang,Matsubae Kazuyo,Zeng Xianlai
Abstract
AbstractDisruptions of key food and fertilizer exports from Russia and Ukraine have exposed many countries to challenges accessing some commodities since these countries’ war began. We evaluated the short-term, external, and direct impacts of disruptions of six food commodities and three types of fertilizer supplies from Russia and Ukraine on food access for all trading partners of the two countries by applying a set of trade and socioeconomic indicators. We found that the external food supplies of 279 countries and territories were affected to varying degrees; 24 countries—especially Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia—are extremely vulnerable because they depend almost entirely on a variety of food imports from Russia and Ukraine. Access to fertilizers was affected in 136 countries and territories, particularly Estonia (potassic fertilizer), Mongolia (nitrogenous fertilizers), Kazakhstan (mixed fertilizers), and Brazil, the United States, China, and India (all types of fertilizers). An integrated assessment of countries’ import types, purchasing power parity per capita, and populations indicated that the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Egypt, and Pakistan are most vulnerable to such supply disruptions. Development of research into diversification and decentralization strategies for food access is needed to guide stable food supply policies.
Funder
JST-Mirai Program
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). New Scenarios on Global Food Security based on Russia–Ukraine Conflict. https://www.fao.org/director-general/news/news-article/en/c/1476480/. Accessed 11 Mar 2022.
2. Poutanen, K. S. et al. Grains: A major source of sustainable protein for health. Nutr. Rev. 80, 1648–1663. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuab084 (2022).
3. Shiferaw, B. et al. Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Secur. 5, 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0263-y (2013).
4. Day, S., Alexander, P. & Maslin, M. Energy decarbonization threatens food security by reducing the availability of cheap sulfur. Nat. Food 4, 442–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00782-1 (2023).
5. Stewart, W. M., Dibb, D. W., Johnston, A. E. & Smyth, T. J. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron. J. 97, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0001 (2005).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献