Author:
Fraulob M.,Vayron R.,Le Cann S.,Lecuelle B.,Hériveaux Y.,Albini Lomami H.,Flouzat Lachaniette C. H.,Haïat G.
Abstract
AbstractThe evolution of bone tissue quantity and quality in contact with the surface of orthopedic and dental implants is a strong determinant of the surgical outcome but remains difficult to be assessed quantitatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of a quantitative ultrasound (QUS) method to measure bone-implant interface (BII) properties. A dedicated animal model considering coin-shaped titanium implants with two levels of surface roughness (smooth, Sa = 0.49 µm and rough, Sa = 3.5 µm) allowed to work with a reproducible geometry and a planar interface. The implants were inserted in rabbit femurs and tibiae for 7 or 13 weeks. The ultrasonic response of the BII was measured ex vivo, leading to the determination of the 2-D spatial variations of bone in contact with the implant surface. Histological analysis was carried out to determine the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio. The amplitude of the echo was significantly higher after 7 weeks of healing time compared to 13 weeks, for both smooth (p < 0.01) and rough (p < 0.05) implants. A negative correlation (R = − 0.63) was obtained between the ultrasonic response and the BIC. This QUS technique is more sensitive to changes of BII morphology compared to histological analyses.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Buser, D., Dula, K., Lang, N. P. & Nyman, S. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique—5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 7, 175–183 (1996).
2. Nedir, R. et al. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants—results from a private practice. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 15, 150–157 (2004).
3. Sbordone, L., Toti, P., Menchini-Fabris, G., Sbordone, C. & Guidetti, F. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 24, 695–703 (2009).
4. Huja, S. S., Katona, T. R., Burr, D. B., Garetto, L. P. & Roberts, W. E. Microdamage adjacent toendosseousimplants. Bone 25, 217–222 (1999).
5. Davies, J. E. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J. Dent. Educ. 67, 932–949 (2003).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献