Author:
Dawson Michael R. W.,Perez Arturo,Sylvestre Sara
Abstract
AbstractHow does the brain represent musical properties? Even with our growing understanding of the cognitive neuroscience of music, the answer to this question remains unclear. One method for conceiving possible representations is to use artificial neural networks, which can provide biologically plausible models of cognition. One could train networks to solve musical problems, and then study how these networks encode musical properties. However, researchers rarely examine network structure in detail because networks are difficult to interpret, and because many assume that networks capture informal or subsymbolic properties. Here we report very high correlations between network connection weights and discrete Fourier phase spaces used to represent musical sets. This is remarkable because there is no clear mathematical relationship between network learning rules and discrete Fourier analysis. That networks discover Fourier phase spaces indicates that these spaces have an important role to play outside of formal music theory. Finding phase spaces in networks raises the strong possibility that Fourier components are possible codes for musical cognition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Deutsch, D. The Psychology Of Music. 2nd edn, (Academic Press, 1999).
2. Krumhansl, C. L. Cognitive Foundations Of Musical Pitch. (Oxford University Press, 1990).
3. Sloboda, J. A. The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology Of Music. (Oxford University Press, 1985).
4. Abbott, A. Neurobiology: Music, maestro, please! Nature 416, 12–14, https://doi.org/10.1038/416012a (2002).
5. Peretz, I. & Zatorre, R. J. The Cognitive Neuroscience Of Music. (Oxford University Press, 2003).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献