Abstract
Abstract
Seedling grafting could provide additional crop improvement strategies for cotton. However, there existed limited studies on interspecific grafting and approaches. Four different grafting approaches were developed and compared between lines representing three of the four cultivated cotton species G. hirsutum, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum. Grafting approaches of this study focused on the cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves retained on scions, rootstocks, without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on scions and rootstocks or halved cotyledon node and single cotyledon leaf on scions and rootstocks. Evaluations of the grafting approaches were made by comparing survival and growth rate during the second and fifth weeks after transplantation, respectively. The formation of any lateral shoots at the grafted sites were studied in two of four grafting approaches in the first and the second year during flowering stage. DNA alterations due to grafting were investigated using microsatellite markers. There were no statistically significant differences between grafts and their control in survival rate and locus specific DNA alteration. Growth rate and lateral shoot formation, on the other hand, were different among grafting types and grafts. We concluded that grafting without cotyledon node and cotyledon leaves on rootstocks, and with cotyledon node but without cotyledon leaves on scions were easy to perform and suitable for interspecific cotton grafting. Results suggested that grafting seedlings and allowing time to heal graft wounds prior to spring transplanting or double cropping is suitable for wheat–cotton intercropping to prevent late or early chilling damage associated with seed sowing or conventional transplanting of susceptible seedlings. Furthermore, the rapid and consistent wound healing in seedling grafts along with lateral shoot formation occurring in two of four grafting approaches make them a suitable approach to investigate possible genetic and epigenetic movement between scions and rootstocks, especially across species.
Funder
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Karaca, M. Characterization of Cynodon spp. and Gossypium spp. genomes using molecular and cytological techniques. PhD Dissertation [DAI, 62, no. 05B (2001): p. 2119 ISBN: 0- 493–26105- 2], Mississippi State University, MS, USA (2001).
2. Chen, X. et al. Molecular mechanisms of fiber differential development between G. barbadense and G. hirsutum revealed by genetical genomics. PLoS ONE 7, e30056.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030056
(2012).
3. OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural outlook. OECD agriculture statistics (database). https://doi.org/
https://doi.org/10.1787/agr-outl-data-en
(2019).
4. Darawsheh, M. K., Kakabouki, I., Roussis, I. & Bilalis, D. J. Cotton response to planting patterns under effect of typical and limited irrigation regime. Not. Bot. Hortic. Agrobo. 47, 1206–1214.
https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47411712
(2019).
5. Wang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, G. & Ma, Z. An integrated breeding technology for accelerating generation advancement and trait introgression in cotton. Plant Breed. 130, 569–573.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01868.x
(2011).
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献