Author:
Beheshtinia Mohammad Ali,Bahrami Fatemeh,Fathi Masood,Asadi Shahla
Abstract
AbstractHealthcare waste disposal center location (HCWDCL) impacts the environment and the health of living beings. Different and sometimes contradictory criteria in determining the appropriate site location for disposing of healthcare waste (HCW) complicate the decision-making process. This research presents a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, named PROMSIS, to determine the appropriate HCWDCL in a real case. The PROMSIS is the combination of two well-known MCDM methods, namely TOPSIS and PROMETHEE. Moreover, fuzzy theory is used to describe the uncertainties of the problem parameters. To provide a reliable decision on selecting the best HCWDCL, a comprehensive list of criteria is identified through a literature review and experts’ opinions obtained from the case study. In total, 40 criteria are identified and classified into five major criteria, namely economic, environmental, social, technical, and geological. The weight of the considered criteria is determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Then, the score of the alternative HCWDCLs in each considered criterion is obtained. Finally, the candidate locations for disposing of HCWs are ranked by the proposed fuzzy PROMSIS method. The results show that the most important criteria in ranking the alternatives in the studied case are economic, environmental, and social, respectively. Moreover, the sub-criteria of operating cost, transportation cost, and pollution are identified as the most important sub-criteria, respectively.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Achwoka, D. et al. Noncommunicable disease burden among HIV patients in care: A national retrospective longitudinal analysis of HIV-treatment outcomes in Kenya, 2003–2013. BMC Public Health 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6716-2 (2019).
2. Mishra, A. R. & Rani, P. Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method. Complex Intell. Syst. 7, 2469–2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00407-9 (2021).
3. Tiseo, I. Volume of biomedical waste generated across India from 2007 to 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1050818/india-biomedical-waste-generated-volume/ (2023).
4. Yazdani, M., Tavana, M., Pamučar, D. & Chatterjee, P. A rough based multi-criteria evaluation method for healthcare waste disposal location decisions. Comput. Ind. Eng. 143, 106394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106394 (2020).
5. Tiseo, I. Asian cities healthcare waste generation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1167512/healthcare-waste-generation-before-during-covid-19-asia-by-city/ (2023).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献