Different histopathologic profiles and outcomes between sun-exposed BCC and non-sun-exposed BCC

Abstract

AbstractAsian population is a low-risk group for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and there is little data available in this setting. Sun-exposed BCC (SEBCC) may possess a different pathogenic mechanism from non-sun-exposed BCC (NSEBCC). To compare the histopathological profiles and outcomes between SEBCC and NSEBCC, and to assess the risk factors for tumor recurrences. Retrospective cohort study on 372 patients with pathologically diagnosed BCC from January 1, 1990 to August 31, 2017. Data were derived from a single medical center in Taiwan. SEBCC presented with higher Clark level and more high-risk factors for recurrence than NSEBCC. Nodular, micronodular, infiltrating/mixed infiltrating, basosquamous, and adenoid types were predominant in SEBCC, as superficial type in NSEBCC. Risk factors for recurrence included infiltrating/mixed-infiltrating subtypes and synchronous basosquamous cell carcinoma. No recurrence events were observed in NSEBCC. Our study showed an acceptable recurrence rate (4.2%) of the whole population after excision even under a smaller surgical margin width than suggested by current guidelines. SEBCC had a higher recurrence rate with a significantly different tumor characteristic from NSEBCC and a greater tumor depth than NSEBCC. A wider surgical margin in SEBCC than NSEBCC is suggested.