Author:
Kong Wenwen,Huang Suiliang,Yang Zhenjiang,Shi Feifei,Feng Yibei,Khatoon Zobia
Abstract
AbstractThe effect of fish feed quality has gained increasing attention to alleviate the harmful environmental impacts induced by intensive aquaculture. In current research, we have conducted an incubator experiment to highlight the effect of fish feed quality on aquaculture water environment. Fish feed from three manufactures with two different dosages (0.1000 g, 0.2000 g) was added to the culture medium with and without Microcystis aeruginosa. Treatments with Microcystis aeruginosa were named as MHT, MHP and MZT; while the treatments without Microcystis aeruginosa named as HT, HP and ZT. Microcystis aeruginosa densities and nutrients concentrations were measured in the study. Results have shown that fish feed quality (manufactures) has a great effect on nutrients concentrations in the absence of Microcystis aeruginosa (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, fish feed can stimulate Microcystis aeruginosa growth that is also influenced by fish feed quality excluding lag phase (0~12 day) significantly in general (P < 0.05). The maximum Microcystis aeruginosa density (Nmax) is 1221.5, 984.5, 581.0, 2265.9, 2056.8 and 1766.6 1 × 104 cells mL−1 for MHT 0.1 g, MHP 0.1 g, MZT 0.1 g, MHT 0.2 g, MHP 0.2 g and MZT 0.2 g, respectively. In treatments with algae, fish feed quality affect total phosphorus (TP) concentrations (except the difference between MHT and MHP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations significantly (P < 0.05). For most of consumed nutrients, the obvious differences among all treatments were observed excluding lag phase in general (P < 0.05), which suggest that the nutrient utilization is also dependent on fish feed quality. Keeping in mind the above facts it is concluded that fish feed quality is a key factor in impacting aquaculture water environment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. FAO (Feed and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). All information collections, http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/collections/zh, (2016).
2. Baum, J. K., Mcpherson, J. M. & Myers, R. A. Farming need not replace fishing if stocks are rebuilt. Nature 437(7055), 26–26 (2005).
3. Olsen, Y. Resources for fish feed in future mariculture. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 1(1), 187–200 (2011).
4. Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Feed Matters: Satisfying the Feed Demand of Aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science 23(1), 1–10 (2015).
5. Tacon, A. G. J. Aquafeeds and feeding strategies, In: Review of the State of World Aquaculture, (FAO). FAO Fisheries Circular No. 886 (Revision 1), FAO, Rome (1997).
Cited by
60 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献