Author:
Brüningk Sarah C.,Peacock Jeffrey,Whelan Christopher J.,Brady-Nicholls Renee,Yu Hsiang-Hsuan M.,Sahebjam Solmaz,Enderling Heiko
Abstract
AbstractRecurrent high grade glioma patients face a poor prognosis for which no curative treatment option currently exists. In contrast to prescribing high dose hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT, $$\ge 6$$
≥
6
Gy $$\times$$
×
5 in daily fractions) with debulking intent, we suggest a personalized treatment strategy to improve tumor control by delivering high dose intermittent radiation treatment (iRT, $$\ge 6$$
≥
6
Gy $$\times$$
×
1 every 6 weeks). We performed a simulation analysis to compare HFSRT, iRT and iRT plus boost ($$\ge 6$$
≥
6
Gy $$\times$$
×
3 in daily fractions at time of progression) based on a mathematical model of tumor growth, radiation response and patient-specific evolution of resistance to additional treatments (pembrolizumab and bevacizumab). Model parameters were fitted from tumor growth curves of 16 patients enrolled in the phase 1 NCT02313272 trial that combined HFSRT with bevacizumab and pembrolizumab. Then, iRT +/− boost treatments were simulated and compared to HFSRT based on time to tumor regrowth. The modeling results demonstrated that iRT + boost(− boost) treatment was equal or superior to HFSRT in 15(11) out of 16 cases and that patients that remained responsive to pembrolizumab and bevacizumab would benefit most from iRT. Time to progression could be prolonged through the application of additional, intermittently delivered fractions. iRT hence provides a promising treatment option for recurrent high grade glioma patients for prospective clinical evaluation.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献