Author:
Muñoz-Ulecia Enrique,Bernués Alberto,Briones-Hidrovo Andrei,Casasús Isabel,Martín-Collado Daniel
Abstract
AbstractLivestock systems contribution to environmental change is controversial. Pasture-based systems are considered a sustainable alternative due to their adaptation to the use of local natural resources. However, they have limited productivity per product unit and, in Europe, depend on public economic support. Furthermore, they are heterogeneous in farm structure and resources use, which may determine their sustainability. We use emergy accounting to assess the sustainability of mountain pasture-based cattle systems and analyse the variability among farms. Emergy accounting assesses the sustainability performance of complex systems (i.e., farming systems) and their interaction with other systems (i.e., the environment and the socio-economic system) focusing on the origin, quality and quantity of the energy required for the system to function. Results show that pasture-based systems largely use local natural renewable resources but depend largely on the wider socio-economic system given their reliance on public economic support and purchased animal feeds. This economic dependence turns out in most farms largely using non-renewable resources. Increasing self-produced feeds and grazing on natural pastures can reduce the dependence on the socio-economic system and improve farm sustainability.
Funder
Gobierno de Aragón
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22(4), 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09595-220408 (2017).
2. IPCC. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. (2019).
3. IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (2019) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673.
4. Leroy, F. et al. Animal board invited review: Animal source foods in healthy, sustainable, and ethical diets—An argument against drastic limitation of livestock in the food system. Animal 16, 100457 (2022).
5. Muñoz-Ulecia, E., Rodríguez Gómez, M., Bernués Jal, A., Benhamou Prat, A. & Martín-Collado, D. Do animal source foods always ensure healthy, sustainable, and ethical diets?. Animal 16, 1 (2022).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献