Abstract
AbstractDefinitions of obedience require the experience of conflict in response to an authority’s demands. Nevertheless, we know little about this conflict and its resolution. Two experiments tested the suitability of the ‘object-destruction paradigm’ for the study of conflict in obedience. An experimenter instructed participants to shred bugs (among other objects) in a manipulated coffee grinder. In contrast to the demand condition, participants in the control condition were reminded of their free choice. Both received several prods if they defied the experimenter. Results show that participants were more willing to kill bugs in the demand condition. Self-reported negative affect was increased after instructions to destroy bugs relative to other objects (Experiments 1 and 2). In Experiment 2, compliant participants additionally showed an increase in tonic skin conductance and, crucially, self-reported more agency and responsibility after alleged bug-destruction. These findings elucidate the conflict experience and resolution underlying obedience. Implications for prominent explanations (agentic shift, engaged followership) are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Bregman, R. Humankind: A Hopeful History. (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020).
2. Snyder, T. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. (Random House, 2017).
3. Gibson, S. Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology’s conception of “obedience”. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 58, 241–259 (2019).
4. Milgram, S. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. (Harper & Row, 1974).
5. Hofling, C. K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N. & Pierce, C. M. An experimental study in nurse-physician relationships. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 143, 171–180 (1966).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献