Author:
Segovia Michelle S.,Huseynov Samir,Palma Marco A.,Nayga Rodolfo M.
Abstract
AbstractThis study evaluates the psychological impact of stay-at-home extension orders during COVID-19 and its relationship with individuals’ expectations on the duration of the extensions. An online survey was administered to 1259 US adult residents to measure symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and stress induced by different stay-at-home order extensions using hypothetical length scenarios. We find that individuals exposed to two 2-week order extensions exhibit higher levels of stress and anxiety compared to those exposed to a single 4-week extension. We also find that subjects with longer expected extensions exhibit more signs of psychological damage than those with shorter expected extensions. Furthermore, we find that the negative psychological consequences of providing two shorter extensions is observed only among subjects with extension expectations of four weeks or less. Our results demonstrate that people’s expectations affect the level of psychological damage caused by lockdown mandates. Our findings suggest that whenever lockdown extensions are necessary, reduced psychological distress may be possible by implementing a one-time restriction, rather than extending multiple smaller extensions perhaps due to manipulation of personal expectations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Global Migration Health (DGMH). History of Quarantine. https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/historyquarantine.html (2020).
2. Manuell, M. E. & Cukor, J. Mother Nature versus human nature: Public compliance with evacuation and quarantine. Disasters 35(2), 417–442 (2011).
3. Rubin, G. J., & Wessely, S. The psychological effects of quarantining a city. BMJ 368 (2020).
4. Taylor, M. R., Agho, K. E., Stevens, G. J. & Raphael, B. Factors influencing psychological distress during a disease epidemic: Data from Australia’s first outbreak of equine influenza. BMC Public Health 8(1), 347 (2008).
5. Zhang, J. et al. The differential psychological distress of populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav. Immun. 87, 49 (2020).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献