Author:
Al-Saadi Ahmed,Al-Farhany Khaled,Idan Al-Chlaihawi Kadhim K.,Jamshed Wasim,Eid Mohamed R.,Tag El Din El Sayed M.,Raizah Zehba
Abstract
AbstractThe present study proposes aerodynamically optimized exterior designs of a sport utility vehicle using computational fluid dynamics analysis based on steady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models. To achieve an optimal design, modifications of the outer shape and adding some aerodynamic devices are investigated. This study focuses on modifying this vehicle model’s upper and front parts. At the same time, the rear diffuser and spare tire on the back door as a fairing are used as aerodynamic devices for improving streamlines. All these modifications and add-on devices are simulated individually or in combination to achieve the best exterior design. A variety of Reynolds numbers are used for determining the optimization variables. Tetrahedral cells are used throughout the global domain because of the sharp edges in the geometry of the Discovery car model. At the same time, prism cells around car surfaces are adopted to improve the accuracy of the results. A good agreement between the numerical drag coefficient in the present study for the baseline models and the experimental data has been achieved. Changes in the drag and lift coefficients are calculated for all models. It is clear from the numerical results that the use of combined modifications and add-on devices has a significant effect in improving the overall aerodynamic behavior. As a result, the drag coefficient for the optimal design of the Discovery 4th generation is reduced from 0.4 to 0.352 by about 12% compared to the benchmark. Simultaneously, the lift coefficient is 0.037 for optimal design, and it is an acceptable value. It is found that combining all optimal modified configurations can improve both CD and CL simultaneously.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Obidi, T. Y. Theory and Applications of Aerodynamics for Ground Vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE International, 2014).
2. Roy, S. & Srinivasan, P. External flow analysis of a truck for drag reduction. SAE Tech. Pap. 1, 808–812 (2000).
3. Thacker, A., Aubrun, S., Leroy, A. & Devinant, P. Effects of suppressing the 3D separation on the rear slant on the flow structures around an Ahmed body. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 107, 237–243 (2012).
4. Verzicco, R., Fatica, M., Iaccarino, G., Moin, P. & Khalighi, B. Large eddy simulation of a road vehicle with drag-reduction devices. AIAA J. 40(12), 2447–2455 (2002).
5. Schuetz, T. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles 5th edn. (Society of Automotive Engineers, 2016).