Abstract
AbstractThe current study investigated the cognitive and neural substrates that underpin writing ability. We explored similarities and differences in writing numbers and words and compared these to language and manual actions in a large group of sub-acute, stroke patients (n = 740). The behavioral data showed association and dissociation in the ability to write words and numbers. Comorbidities of writing deficits with both language and motor impairments were prevalent, with less than a handful showing deficits restricted to the writing tasks. A second analysis with a subset of patients (n = 267) explored the neural networks that mediate writing abilities. Lesion to right temporal contributed to writing words, while lesions to left postcentral contributed to writing numbers. Overlapping neural mechanisms included the bilateral prefrontal cortex, right inferior parietal, left middle occipital and the right cerebellum. With the former regions associated with error pattern typical to writing based on prior knowledge (the lexical route), while lesion to left MOG was associated with errors to the phonological (non-lexical) route. Using principle components extracted from the behavioral data, we showed that right prefrontal and right parietal contributed to the ability to use pen, while lesion to bilateral prefrontal, inferior temporal and cerebellum supported unique use of pen for writing. The behavioral and imaging data suggested that writing numbers and words primarily relied on overlapping cognitive and neural functions. Incidents of pure writing deficits, in the absence of motor or language deficits were rare. Nevertheless, the PCA and neural data suggested that writing abilities were associated with some unique neuro-cognitive functions, specifically dedicated to the use of pen and the ability to transform meaning to motor command.
Funder
Guangzhou General Science and Technology Project of Health and Family Planning
Guangzhou Planned Project of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L. Cultural recycling of Cortical Maps. 384–398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004 (2007).
2. Goldstein, K. Language and language disturbances; aphasic symptom complexes and their significance for medicine and theory of language (1948).
3. Roeltgen, D. P. & Heilman, K. M. Lexical agraphia. Further support for the two-system hypothesis of linguistic agraphia. Brain 107(Pt 3), 811–27 (1984).
4. Roeltgen, D. P. & Heilman, K. M. Review of agraphia and a proposal for an anatomically-based neuropsychological model of writing. Appl. Psycholinguist. 6, 205–229 (1985).
5. Margolin, D. I. The neuropsychology of writing and spelling: Semantic, phonological, motor, and perceptual processes. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 36, 459–489 (1984).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献