Author:
Fyles Martyn,Vihta Karina-Doris,Sudre Carole H,Long Harry,Das Rajenki,Jay Caroline,Wingfield Tom,Cumming Fergus,Green William,Hadjipantelis Pantelis,Kirk Joni,Steves Claire J,Ourselin Sebastien,Medley Graham F,Fearon Elizabeth,House Thomas
Abstract
AbstractVariability in case severity and in the range of symptoms experienced has been apparent from the earliest months of the COVID-19 pandemic. From a clinical perspective, symptom variability might indicate various routes/mechanisms by which infection leads to disease, with different routes requiring potentially different treatment approaches. For public health and control of transmission, symptoms in community cases were the prompt upon which action such as PCR testing and isolation was taken. However, interpreting symptoms presents challenges, for instance, in balancing the sensitivity and specificity of individual symptoms with the need to maximise case finding, whilst managing demand for limited resources such as testing. For both clinical and transmission control reasons, we require an approach that allows for the possibility of distinct symptom phenotypes, rather than assuming variability along a single dimension. Here we address this problem by bringing together four large and diverse datasets deriving from routine testing, a population-representative household survey and participatory smartphone surveillance in the United Kingdom. Through the use of cutting-edge unsupervised classification techniques from statistics and machine learning, we characterise symptom phenotypes among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive community cases. We first analyse each dataset in isolation and across age bands, before using methods that allow us to compare multiple datasets. While we observe separation due to the total number of symptoms experienced by cases, we also see a separation of symptoms into gastrointestinal, respiratory and other types, and different symptom co-occurrence patterns at the extremes of age. In this way, we are able to demonstrate the deep structure of symptoms of COVID-19 without usual biases due to study design. This is expected to have implications for the identification and management of community SARS-CoV-2 cases and could be further applied to symptom-based management of other diseases and syndromes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, 2022. URL https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. 25 May 2022.
2. Hale, Thomas et al. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nat. Hum. Behav. 5(4), 529–538 (2021).
3. Google LLC. Community Mobility Reports, 2021. URL https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/.
4. Fyles, Martyn, Fearon, Elizabeth & Overton, Christopher. University of Manchester COVID-19 Modelling Group, Tom Wingfield, Graham F. Medley, Ian Hall, Lorenzo Pellis, and Thomas House. Using a household-structured branching process to analyse contact tracing in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Philosop. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 376(1829):20200267, (2021).
5. Crozier, Alex, Dunning, Jake, Rajan, Selina, Semple, Malcolm G & Buchan, Malcolm G. Could expanding the COVID-19 case definition improve the UK’s pandemic response? BMJ, 374, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1625. URL https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1625.